TrustGraph APIs

Overview

If you want to interact with TrustGraph through APIs, there are 4 forms of API which may be of interest to you. All four mechanisms invoke the same underlying TrustGraph functionality but are made available for integration in different ways:

Pulsar APIs

Apache Pulsar is a pub/sub system used to deliver messages between TrustGraph components. Using Pulsar, you can communicate with TrustGraph components.

Pros:

  • Provides complete access to all TrustGraph functionality
  • Simple integration with metrics and observability

Cons:

  • Integration is non-trivial, requires a special-purpose Pulsar client library
  • The Pulsar interfaces are likely something that you would not want to expose outside of the processing cluster in a production or well-secured deployment

REST APIs

A component, api-gateway, provides a bridge between Pulsar internals and the REST API which allows many services to be invoked using REST APIs.

Pros:

  • Uses standard REST approach can be easily integrated into many kinds of technology
  • Can be easily protected with authentication and TLS for production-grade or secure deployments

Cons:

  • For a complex application, a long series of REST invocations has latency and performance overheads - HTTP has limits on the number of concurrent service invocations
  • Lower coverage of functionality - service interfaces need to be added to api-gateway to permit REST invocation

Websocket API

The api-gateway component also provides access to services through a websocket API.

Pros:

  • Usable through a standard websocket library
  • Can be easily protected with authentication and TLS for production-grade or secure deployments
  • Supports concurrent service invocations

Cons:

  • Websocket service invocation is a little more complex to develop than using a basic REST API, particular if you want to cover all of the error scenarios well

Python SDK API

The trustgraph-base package provides a Python SDK that wraps the underlying service invocations in a convenient Python API.

Pros:

  • Native Python integration with type hints and documentation
  • Simplified service invocation without manual message handling
  • Built-in error handling and response parsing
  • Convenient for Python-based applications and scripts

Cons:

  • Python-specific, not available for other programming languages
  • Requires Python environment and trustgraph-base package installation
  • Less control over low-level message handling

Flow-hosted APIs

There are two types of APIs: Flow-hosted which need a flow to be running to operate. Non-flow-hosted which are core to the system, and can be seen as ‘global’ - they are not dependent on a flow to be running.

Knowledge, Librarian, Config and Flow APIs fall into the latter category.

See also

Table of contents